September 17, 2014

Publish the Constitution Annotated As Data

By Daniel Schuman

ConstitutionDear Library of Congress and Government Printing Office,

For decades, you have jointly published a handy compendium that explains the U.S. Constitution as it has been interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court. It took a couple of letters from the Senate (and repeated nudging from the public interest community—2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013) to move you to publish the Constitution Annotated online more than once a decade, but you still do not regularly publish it online in a structured-data format. Instead, the Constitution Annotated is published as a PDF, which has not been updated in 15 months.

The entire point of the document is to educate the public and Congress about the Constitution. As a technical matter, the Constitution Annotated is prepared as an XML file, published internally to congressional staff as a series of web pages, and updated regularly. You could simply make those pages available to the public and we would all be happy. Instead, the public interest community must keep pestering you, year after year.

Why do we care? Publishing the Constitution Annotated in a structured-data format means that the public can easily reuse the information so that more people can benefit from the knowledge it contains. Structured data makes it easier to embed the information in Wikipedia, or create better websites on the Constitution, and so on. It also means we can do neat things with the contents, such as automatically classifying Supreme Court cases by topic simply by drawing upon the document’s structure.

Publishing the Constitution Annotated in structured-data format is also within your mission. As the respective repository and publisher of government-generated information, providing public access to an authoritative explanation of our nation's founding document, as interpreted over the years, is the kind of thing you do.

So I ask you, on Constitution Day 2014, let's get this fixed before next year. We're happy to help.

Op-Ed: Why We Need FOIA Reform Now

With limited legislative weeks left, Congress must pass the FOIA Improvement Act of 2014 to restore FOIA to its original purpose. Read More ›

Federal Election Commission’s Failure to Act Leaves Murray Energy Employees Vulnerable

Two years have passed since CREW filed a complaint with the FEC alleging Robert Murray of Murray Energy illegally coerced employees to contribute to the company's PAC, yet the FEC has failed to respond. Read More ›

Op-Ed: Perry Deserved Indictment

The recent indictment of Texas Governor Rick Perry is not partisan politics, but rather another example of Perry's misconduct. Read More ›

Major Airlines Contribute Airfare to Honor Politicians

Southwest Airlines, United Airlines, and Alaska Airlines have collectively contributed more than $2.3 million in in-kind airfare to charities in honor of members of Congress and senior administration officials. Read More ›

Squeezing Transparency out of the 113th Congress

As the 113th Congress returns this week for its remaining legislative weeks, CREW highlights pieces of legislation that we would like to see pass. Read More ›

The Price the FEC Must Pay For Insisting On a Legally Flawed Position: Over $153,000

After a long running lawsuit against the Federal Election Commission based on a FOIA request, U.S. District Court Judge Kollar-Kotelly ordered the agency to pay CREW more than $153,000. Read More ›

© 2014 Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, all rights reserved.
• 409 7th St. NW • Suite 300 • Washington, DC 20004 • 202-408-5565 •

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington®, and the
“CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington” wordmark are registered trademarks.