Blog — Campaign Finance Reform
What do American Commitment and Patriot Majority USA have in common? They are both “dark money” groups that enjoy tax-exempt status and spend lots of money on political activity. It also can be pretty hard to find out more about them.
CREW, a government watchdog, is committed to advancing transparency. Dark money nonprofits aren’t required to disclose their donors, but they do have to file annual tax returns providing a window into their revenue and spending. By law, the forms are supposed to be available to anyone who goes to the group’s office during business hours and requests them, which CREW does regularly. Some of these groups, however, don’t make it as easy as it sounds.
A few groups are staffed by professionals who turn over documents with a minimum of fuss. Crossroads GPS, one of the biggest, even offered coffee and donuts. Some groups comply, but throw in snide comments. Others refuse to turn over filings that are supposed to be public until they hear from CREW’s lawyers, or like Freedom Partners, we file a complaint. More than once, we’ve gone to addresses that turn out to be post office boxes or UPS stores, or found a group has moved without leaving a forwarding address.
Take Patriot Majority USA, which spent more than $7 million on political activity during the 2012 elections. The group has a flashy website and more than 135,000 Facebook “Likes,” but its offices are hard to find. Patriot Majority USA is no longer at the address listed on last year’s tax filing, according to the building’s management. It lists a post office box on its website, and only one email address. When we called the number provided on last year’s 990 form there was no voicemail and no indication calls were being forwarded. Another group, American Commitment, wasn’t at the address listed on its prior tax return. When we called, we were told the group had moved, but the person on the phone wouldn’t give us the new address.
UPDATE: American Commitment referred CREW to its attorney, who provided the group's tax return. It is available here.
Keep in mind these are nonprofit groups spending millions of dollars to influence elections, all the while claiming political activity isn’t their primary purpose. Instead, they qualify for tax-exempt status by promising to promote social welfare. So why are they so reluctant to let us take a look at the already minimal information about their activities they are required to make public? Dark money may be opaque, but one thing is clear: finding out more about the groups trying to influence citizens’ votes shouldn’t be this hard.
More Blog Posts
The document Freedom Partners released yesterday reveals yet another attempt to avoid disclosing any information about its real financial backers. Read More ›
November 8, 2013 | 501c Groups, Campaign Finance Reform, Corporate, Federal Agencies, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Financial, Disclosure, Legal, IRS Complaints, Transparency, Koch Brothers
A complex money laundering scheme to fund political activities without disclosing the source of the funds reveals several important facts about the current state of dark money and campaign finance laws. Read More ›
October 30, 2013 | 501c Groups, Campaign Finance Reform, Elections, Financial, Disclosure, Organizations, American Future Fund, Americans for Job Security, States, California, Supreme Court, Citizens United decision, McCutcheon v. FEC, Koch Brothers
There are nepotism rules on the books when it comes to federal jobs, but no laws apply to campaigns and political action committees - and members of Congress know it. Read More ›
October 20, 2013 | Campaign Finance Reform, Congress, Corruption, Ethics, Conflict of Interests, Congressional Ethics, Federal Agencies, Federal Election Commission (FEC), Governance & Legislation, STOCK Act, News, CBS News
Aggregate limits are at risk as the Supreme Court prepares to hear oral arguments in McCutcheon v. FEC, and the consequences could be just as disastrous as those following the Citizens United decision. Read More ›
Georgia Rep. Paul Broun still has not come clean about the circumstances surrounding hundreds of thousands of dollars in loans to his campaign. Read More ›
September 23, 2013 | Campaign Finance Reform, Congress, Corruption, Ethics, Office of Congressional Ethics, Federal Agencies, Federal Election Commission (FEC), House, Most Corrupt, States, Georgia, House Members, Paul Broun
This morning, the committee will consider the nominations of two commissioners to the FEC, the nomination of the Public Printer, and S. 375, which would require Senate candidates to file disclosure reports electronically. Read More ›