Blog — Campaign Finance Reform
Today in CREW v. Dep’t of the Treasury, et al. (D.D.C.), CREW filed an opposition to the IRS’s motion to dismiss this lawsuit on standing grounds. CREW is challenging the refusal of the IRS to grant CREW’s petition for a rulemaking to reconcile the IRS regulation granting tax-exempt status to § 501(c)(4) organizations that are “primarily engaged” in promoting social welfare with the statutory requirement of the tax code that such groups be operated “exclusively” for such purposes.
CREW’s motion explains the multiple injuries it has suffered as a direct result of the IRS’s “primarily engaged” regulation, including most significantly deprivation of information about the sources of the hundreds of millions of dollars that have flowed anonymously into our elections from § 501(c)(4) groups. If the IRS regulation mirrored the statutory requirement that such groups be operated “exclusively” for social welfare purposes – the ultimate relief CREW seeks – § 501(c)(4) groups wishing to continue to engage in significant political activities likely would form or associate with tax-exempt § 527 groups. Under the tax code, § 527 groups must disclose their donors, the precise information CREW has been deprived of here. This establishes CREW’s harm and right to maintain its lawsuit.
Although the IRS recently published a proposed notice of rulemaking that attempts to define more specifically those political activities that, if performed by § 501(c)(4) organizations, are not promoting social welfare, the IRS left undisturbed its “primarily engaged” regulation. Instead, the IRS indicated it would accept comments on whether it should, at some indeterminate time, change that regulation as well. As a result, the latest regulatory proposal does not affect CREW’s lawsuit, which calls for that precise regulatory change.
More Blog Posts
Earlier this week, CREW helped Florida station WTSP turn the spotlight on other members of Congress using their campaign committees and PACs to pay family members. Read More ›
November 21, 2013 | Campaign Finance Reform, Congress, Elections, Ethics, Financial, Disclosure, House, News, CBS News, Republicans, States, Florida, Transparency, House Members, Dennis Ross, Vern Buchanan
What do American Commitment and Patriot Majority USA have in common? Read More ›
The document Freedom Partners released yesterday reveals yet another attempt to avoid disclosing any information about its real financial backers. Read More ›
November 8, 2013 | 501c Groups, Campaign Finance Reform, Corporate, Federal Agencies, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Financial, Disclosure, Legal, IRS Complaints, Transparency, Koch Brothers
A complex money laundering scheme to fund political activities without disclosing the source of the funds reveals several important facts about the current state of dark money and campaign finance laws. Read More ›
October 30, 2013 | 501c Groups, Campaign Finance Reform, Elections, Financial, Disclosure, Organizations, American Future Fund, Americans for Job Security, States, California, Supreme Court, Citizens United decision, McCutcheon v. FEC, Koch Brothers
There are nepotism rules on the books when it comes to federal jobs, but no laws apply to campaigns and political action committees - and members of Congress know it. Read More ›
October 20, 2013 | Campaign Finance Reform, Congress, Corruption, Ethics, Conflict of Interests, Congressional Ethics, Federal Agencies, Federal Election Commission (FEC), Governance & Legislation, STOCK Act, News, CBS News
Aggregate limits are at risk as the Supreme Court prepares to hear oral arguments in McCutcheon v. FEC, and the consequences could be just as disastrous as those following the Citizens United decision. Read More ›