Blog — Ethics

December 20, 2013

What Is DOJ Hiding About Vern Buchanan?

By Anne Weismann

Rep. Vern Buchanan (R-FL)On Wednesday, CREW filed a lawsuit against the Department of Justice for records from the now-closed investigative file of Congressman Vern Buchanan (R-FL).  This lawsuit follows five others in which CREW seeks to learn why DOJ refused to prosecute members and former members of Congress despite evidence of significant criminal misconduct.  Judge after judge has ruled the public interest in these investigations outweighs the privacy interests of the members of Congress and required DOJ to provide detailed explanations for what it is withholding and why.  Yet in the case of Vern Buchanan DOJ has yet to release to CREW a single document, which raises the obvious question: Just what is DOJ hiding?

Investigated by both the Federal Election Commission and DOJ, Rep. Buchanan has so far managed to elude prosecution.  The Federal Election Commission (FEC) concluded the evidence before it “comes close to supporting a finding that it is more likely than not” Rep. Buchanan violated federal election laws, but declined to act.  And despite reports of widening federal criminal inquiries into Rep. Buchanan’s receipt of excessive and conduit campaign contributions, DOJ pulled the plug on any prosecution in September 2012.

After this announcement, CREW filed Freedom of Information Act requests with DOJ in an effort to learn why, despite the wealth of publicly available evidence of Rep. Buchanan’s misdeeds, DOJ declined to prosecute him.  The government’s response was to stonewall, under the guise of protecting Rep. Buchanan’s privacy rights and claiming the need to protect an ongoing enforcement matter.  When challenged on both grounds, DOJ was forced to pull back, promising further processing of CREW’s requests.

That was six months ago and, to date, CREW has not received a single document from DOJ.  But questions surrounding the legality of Rep. Buchanan’s conduct remain, as do questions about the favorable treatment members of Congress and other public officials seem to receive from DOJ.  Just think of Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell, whose lawyers recently were able to persuade DOJ to defer indictment of the governor.  When high-level elected leaders seem to get preferential treatment from DOJ, the public deserves to know why.  CREW’s latest lawsuit demanding records of the Buchanan investigation is just another step in our continuing effort to hold DOJ accountable for letting corrupt government officials off the hook.

Here We Go Again

Earlier this week, CREW helped Florida station WTSP turn the spotlight on other members of Congress using their campaign committees and PACs to pay family members. Read More ›

Running for Congress Isn’t a Family Business

Anti-nepotism laws keep members of Congress from hiring relatives on their official staffs, but that doesn't stop them from putting their families on the campaign payroll. Read More ›

CREW and 60 Minutes Expose Another Congressional Scheme

There are nepotism rules on the books when it comes to federal jobs, but no laws apply to campaigns and political action committees - and members of Congress know it. Read More ›

Bad News for Bachmann Out of Iowa

Payments to an Iowa state senator took a circuitous and possibly illegal route, in an effort to avoid ethics laws. Read More ›

Rep. Broun Belongs on the List

Georgia Rep. Paul Broun still has not come clean about the circumstances surrounding hundreds of thousands of dollars in loans to his campaign. Read More ›

Supreme Court Ends Term on a High Note, Declaring DOMA Unconstitutional

In a predictably 5-to-4 opinion, Justice Kennedy, writing for the majority, declared DOMA an unconstitutional violation of equal protection guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment Read More ›

© 2015 Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, all rights reserved.
• 455 Massachusetts Avenue NW • Sixth Floor • Washington, DC 20001 • 202-408-5565 •

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington®, and the
“CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington” wordmark are registered trademarks.