Blog — Ethics
There was a fair amount of ethics-related news this week, some serious, some comical, and some right out of a novel.
CREW released a report documenting how the National Mining Association influences Capitol Hill by spending millions of dollars on federal lobbying to, among other things, keep mining firms exempt from paying royalties on what they extract from federal lands. Efforts are underway to amend a law dating back to 1872 to require mining firms to pay royalties, which some estimate could generate as much as $2 billion dollars each year. As CREW Executive Director Melanie Sloan stated, it’s “ironic that even in light of the current budget debacle, Congress can’t agree to scrap an 1872 law preventing the government from raising hundreds of millions — if not billions — of dollars in revenue.”
The House Ethics Committee announced the formation of investigative subcommittees to probe the actions of two lawmakers, Reps. Rob Andrews (D-NJ) and Don Young (R-AK). The inquiry into Rep. Andrews involves his alleged use of campaign funds to pay for personal travel, misuse of official resources, and possible false statements to federal officials. Rep. Young’s alleged misdeeds involve improper gifts, the misuse of campaign funds and false statements. Both lawmakers have long been on CREW’s radar — we have filed complaints on both members — and both have the inglorious distinction of being named to our “Most Corrupt” report.
There was another new twist in the scandal surrounding Sen. Menendez. On Friday, the Washington Post reported that a top law enforcement official in the Dominican Republic said a local lawyer reported being paid $5,000 by the conservative website the Daily Caller to find prostitutes who would lie and say they had been paid to have sex with the senator. Naturally, the Daily Caller denies all.
The Federal Election Commission (FEC) did some house-cleaning this week, terminating some 300 super PACs registered with the commission, which have been proliferating ever since the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United. Stephen Colbert’s “Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow” super PAC no doubt encouraged dozens, if not hundreds, of other faux super PACs in an effort to highlight the absurdity of the present campaign finance enforcement system.
Speaking of Stephen Colbert, he lent a hand in christening the Campaign Legal Center’s “Ham Rove Memorial Conference Room” by offering up videotaped remarks. The event also saw the unveiling of a larger-than-life portrait of the popular Comedy Central host, which will hang over the mantel at the Legal Center.
Finally, an interesting tidbit from the Republican National Committee’s so-called “autopsy” report released this week caught our eye:
"TV spending is out of control. Outside groups spent approximately $1 billion on TV ads in swing states in the final six months of the 2012 campaign. Despite the extraordinary amount of money that was invested in TV by outside groups in 2012, the final results of the election barely differed from the polls six months earlier. There are lots of arguments for why this is the case, and we don't believe we lost because of third-party TV ads. However, the pendulum has swung too far when it comes to spending on TV ads."
One would hope such a conclusion would lead to a reexamination of how we spend (or rather, waste) billions of dollars in our elections, but we’re not holding our breath.
See you next week.
More Blog Posts
It's not likely Rep. Jackson is the only member of Congress who illegally used campaign cash for personal use — he's just one of the few who have been caught. Read More ›
Join us in a nationwide discussion about the importance of access to public information and what it means for you and your community. Read More ›
March 5, 2013 | Ethics, Federal Agencies, National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), FOIA, Governance & Legislation, Transparency and Openness in Government Act, Legal, FOIA Requests, Transparency, Anne Weismann
Advocates of filibuster reform were disappointed by the rules changes adopted last week. But with the changes came some positive reform. Read More ›
While Senate rules reformers have focused their attention on the filibuster, another invisible tactic is also used to impede Senate business: the secret hold. Read More ›