Blog — Supreme Court

April 10, 2013

Senate Hearing Addresses Abuse of Campaign Finance Laws

By CREW Staff

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse at subcommitteeTaking the first serious step toward addressing abuses of tax and campaign finance law by 501(c)(4) "dark money" groups, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) yesterday at a congressional hearing pressed the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) to start prosecuting at least the most blatant and straightforward violators of those laws.

We applaud Sen. Whitehouse for identifying one of the biggest problems in this area, the lack of any effective enforcement by the IRS, DOJ, and the Federal Election Commission (FEC), which has allowed a stream of anonymous money into our elections.

Yesterday’s hearing focused on the failure of the IRS and DOJ to prosecute violations of two laws that have been routinely flouted since the Supreme Court’s disasterous ruling in Citizens United. The Tax Code grants tax-exempt status only to 501(c)(4) groups that are operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare.

Some dark money groups have made false statements in their applications for 501(c)(4) status, telling the IRS they would not engage in any political activity, then running political ads as soon as they get tax-exempt status. In addition, some super PACs and their supporters have violated the law forbidding conduit contributions by using shell corporations to conceal the donor’s identity.

Despite the blatant nature of these violations, the IRS and DOJ aren’t prosecuting anyone, and would not even say at the hearing if they are conducting any investigations. As Senator Whitehouse said, by failing to prosecute these violations, the IRS and DOJ appear to be “complicit in the mockery that is made of these tax laws.”

Sen. Whitehouse identified an even larger problem caused by the IRS’s regulations implementing section 501(c)(4) of the Code. While the Code provides tax-exempt status for groups “operated exclusively” for social welfare purposes, IRS regulations provide such groups need only be “primarily engaged” in social welfare. This has created an enormous loophole that many groups have exploited, reasoning they still meet the definition of a 501(c)(4) group if they spend up to 49 percent of their annual revenue on political activities.

In Sen. Whitehouse’s words:

“the IRS has taken one of the clearer statutes passed by Congress and through its regulations has so defanged and confused the law as to make it virtually unenforceable by the agency.”

CREW agrees, and has taken steps in recent months to close this loophole. In February, CREW and former congressional candidate Dr. David Gill sued the IRS for flouting the statute, and just yesterday, CREW filed a petition for rulemaking calling on the IRS to amend its regulations.

We are heartened by Sen. Whitehouse’s first steps, and look forward to more oversight hearings and hopefully legislation that will prohibit 501(c)(4) groups from using anonymous funds to engage in political activities – activities the Tax Code, but not IRS regulations, now ban.

 

Attack Ads Do Not Promote Social Welfare

Critics of our lawsuit against the IRS either ignore or fail to grasp the basis for the lawsuit, the facts upon which it is based, and our ultimate goal. Read More ›

Op-Ed: Transparency Doesn’t End at State Line

State and local records bear directly on issues of national importance. The Supreme Court should strike down Virginia's resident-only public records law. Read More ›

TAKE ACTION: Ask DOJ to investigate this lying dark money group

After killing a 100 year old anti-corruption law, documents found in a meth house indicate American Tradition Partnership has broken the law. Sign our petition asking the Dept. of Justice investigate.
Read More ›

Revealing Dark Money and Big Data

Our Senior Counsel, Adam Rappaport, appeared on WNYC to discuss how "social welfare" nonprofit groups, known as 501(c)(4)s are avoid regulation to finance the campaigns. Read More ›

Responding to Citizens United: Is a Constitutional Amendment Inevitable?

After another failed attempt to pass the DISCLOSE Act, a consensus has emerged for a constitutional response to Citizens United. Read More ›

© 2014 Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, all rights reserved.
• 1400 Eye Street NW • Suite 450 • Washington, DC 20005 • 202-408-5565 •


Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington®, and the
“CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington” wordmark are registered trademarks.