Last Friday U.S. District Court Judge John Bates joined a growing list of district court judges unhappy with how the Department of Justice is processing CREW’s FOIA requests. In CREW v. DOJ, CREW’s lawsuit seeking documents related to DOJ’s investigation of former Senator John Ensign (R-NV), Judge Bates issued an opinion and order requiring DOJ to submit declarations describing the efforts of the FBI, the Criminal Division, and the Executive Office of U.S. Attorneys to process CREW’s requests, and denying DOJ’s request to process only a tiny sample of the documents.
DOJ had made the extraordinary request to conduct what it termed a “representative sampling” in lieu of processing all responsive documents. Not only did Judge Bates describe this as “putting the cart before the horse,” but he called DOJ’s bluff, explaining what the agency really wants is “an advisory opinion on how the Court views its preliminary stances on withholding.” The judge demurred, stating the court already has issued “a lengthy opinion ... on whether it [DOJ] appropriately withheld documents.” Further, Judge Bates signaled his overall disagreement with the exemptions DOJ has claimed to date, advising DOJ components to “heed those views.”
In case after case where CREW has sought documents related to closed DOJ investigations of current and former members of Congress, DOJ has dragged its feet, making CREW wait years to receive any documents, and claiming broad exemptions the courts previously have rejected. Judge Bates’ recent decision should cause DOJ to reevaluate its litigating stance, as well as the way in which DOJ components are handling CREW’s requests.
More Blog Posts
Documents released as part of a lawsuit between the sugar and high fructose corn syrup industries offer a rare peak behind the curtain of how Rick Berman's for-profit and nonprofit organizations intertwine. Read More ›
CREW had filed a fee petition, seeking reimbursement for its costs and attorneys’ fees of nearly $140,000 in its long-running litigation against the agency. Read More ›
Citing “the intense interest in the public’s concern about the FBI’s use of drones to conduct domestic surveillance," the district court sides with CREW. Read More ›
Curiously enough, some central players in Rep. Rivera’s scandals are still on Sen. Rubio’s payroll. Read More ›
February 5, 2014 | Congress, Ethics, Federal Agencies, Federal Election Commission (FEC), Financial, Disclosure, House, Republicans, Senate, States, Florida, House Members, David Rivera, Political Candidates, Marco Rubio
Who knew playing Angry Birds on your cell phone could turn you into “a sensor for the world intelligence community?” Read More ›
It may have taken some time, but we applaud the members of Congress who recognize that the Director of National Intelligence lied. Read More ›
January 27, 2014 | Congress, Congressional Testimony, Federal Agencies, National Security Agency (NSA), Senate, House Members, Darrell Issa, James Sensenbrenner, Paul Broun, Ted Poe, Walter Jones, James Clapper