An odd thing happened last November. The Florida-based branch of a yacht dealership with roots in Panama contributed $100,000 to a super PAC, but the super PAC didn’t use the money to run attack ads or to pay for get-out-the-vote work. Instead, it turned around the next day and gave the $100,000 to another super PAC that is currently working to elect Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) president.
The super PAC that facilitated the quick hand off, Conservatives for Effective Government, represents a new model of super PAC. Even though it’s what is formally known as an independent expenditure-only committee, the group doesn’t focus on independents expenditures supporting or opposing candidates. Rather, it serves as a pass through for big money, allowing donors to put an extra barrier between themselves and disclosure.
Take the $100,000 that ultimately ended up in the coffers of the pro-Rubio super PAC, Conservative Solutions PAC. A reporter looking at the group’s filings with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) would see that Conservatives for Effective Government was a major supporter, but wouldn’t know the true source of the money. An extra step would be required to discover that Evermarine LLC was actually helping foot the bill for Conservative Solutions PAC’s pro-Rubio work.
There are drawbacks to this approach though. The use of the super PAC as a pass through for Evermarine’s money, which was first flagged by ProPublica’s Derek Willis, makes the contribution look suspicious. Evermarine could have contributed directly to Conservative Solutions PAC, but didn’t. Why not? Did the company want to put distance between itself and the contributions that would be reported to the FEC by Sen. Rubio’s super PAC?
The company is run by Louis Sola, who previously put his financial support behind Sen. Rubio’s competitor, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, by giving $2,700 to Gov. Bush’s campaign in August. Maybe Mr. Sola didn’t want to take flak for switching his presidential support. If that was the case though, Mr. Sola and Evermarine would probably be otherwise quiet about their presidential leanings. But Evermarine’s Twitter account is filled with pro-Rubio retweets and the occasional pro-Rubio comment.
It is unclear what other motives the company may have for using a conduit to support the pro-Rubio group. Sen. Rubio is known to be a fan of boating and, in what may or may not be a coincidence, he participated in “a meet and greet” at the Fort Lauderdale International Boat Show just three days after Evermarine’s money was transferred to his supportive super PAC. His appearance at the show was arranged by Mr. Sola, who also introduced him.
Regardless of what the exact goal of the conduit contribution was, it is unlikely Conservatives for Effective Government made the contribution to Conservative Solutions PAC without Evermarine or Mr. Sola’s knowledge. The super PAC, which was formed in March 2015, has done nothing to date other than funnel contributions to other super PACs.
Its only other significant activity was contributing $113,000 to the Neighborhood Alliance PAC, which made independent expenditures in Memphis, TN’s mayoral race last year. Conservatives for Effective Government and the Neighborhood Alliance PAC share the same treasurer, Chris Marston, and use the same post office box in Alexandria, VA, which is also used by Mr. Marston’s consulting firm. Mr. Marston is a prolific Republican campaign compliance consultant who recently served as treasurer of the Koch network-tied political nonprofit Trees of Liberty, which was the subject of a recent IRS complaint filed by CREW and the Center for Media and Democracy.
Conservatives for Effective Government’s recent filing with the Federal Election Commission revealed that the $113,000 it gave to the Tennessee-focused PAC was originally provided by Tennessee donors, including $107,500 tied to a Memphis-based company called Tower Ventures Management LLC.
The timeline of money exchanges between the federal super PAC and the one registered in Tennessee suggests a concerted effort to obscure the source of the Neighborhood Alliance PAC’s funding. For instance, on September 9, William Ogrel, the president of Tower Ventures, contributed $50,000 to Conservatives for Effective Government. The same day, Conservatives for Effective Government gave the Neighborhood Alliance PAC $45,000, and that PAC then reported spending $45,000 on consulting, voter data, and phone calls to voters, still on that same day. Later, on September 28, Conservatives for Effective Government gave $18,000 to the Neighborhood Alliance PAC, which spent $17,825 that day on direct mail opposing incumbent Democratic Mayor A.C. Wharton in the Memphis mayor’s race.
The use of Conservatives for Effective Government as a pass through resulted in Memphis voters being kept in the dark about who was spending money to attack a candidate who eventually lost until well after the city’s October 8 Election Day. As the Memphis Commercial Appeal noted in early October, the Neighborhood Alliance PAC’s pre-election filing with the Shelby County Election Commission didn’t “tell much about who is behind that group,” but did “show it’s well-financed.” Mr. Marston refused to talk to the Commercial Appeal about the secretive PAC. Over a month after the Memphis election, Mr. Marston registered the Neighborhood Alliance PAC as a super PAC on the federal level. It is unknown what he plans to do with it.
In short, it appears the purpose of Conservatives for Effective Government is to act as a roadblock to transparency, a form of temporary dead end disclosure. Before contributing to an independent expenditure committee, donors can give their money to the super PAC, which will pass it on in order for the original contributor to stay in the shadows for as long as possible.
More Blog Posts
Center for Medical Progress founder David Daleiden made news—and not the kind of news he wanted—yesterday when a Texas grand jury investigating his claims against Planned Parenthood instead chose to indict him for using a fake ID and attempting to buy fetal tissue. While he may end up a felon in Texas, he still has possible federal charges to worry about. Read More ›
January 26, 2016 |
The constellation of groups that make up the Koch brothers’ political network quietly expanded last spring with the formation of a new nonprofit organization that is affiliated with and ultimately controlled by the network’s flagship organization, Freedom Partners Chamber of Commerce, according to tax filings obtained by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. Operatives for the network incorporated the new group, Freedom Partners Institute, Inc., in Delaware in March 2015. Read More ›
A former top adviser to Rep. Mike Rogers (R-AL) has built a lucrative business around a unique asset: his ability to provide access to his old boss. Between 2003 and 2013, John D. “Tripp” Skipper held several positions with Rep. Rogers on both the campaign trail and in his congressional office. Now, he runs his own lobbying firm, the Skipper Group, and much of his work, according to lobbying disclosure reports, involves interacting with Rep. Rogers’s office. Read More ›
Rep. Tony Cárdenas (D-CA) appears to be spending a lot of time with his lawyers lately. In the last three months, his campaign committee spent $131,470 on “legal services” with five separate law firms, according to new campaign finance records. The legal expenses, which are more than Rep. Cárdenas’ campaign spent in the three previous quarters combined, suggest that a federal investigation involving one of his aides has intensified. Read More ›
January 14, 2016 |
On January 6, Scott Reed, a corporate lobbyist who is also the senior political strategist for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, filed several lobbying disclosure reports with the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives covering the 4th quarter of 2015. Normally, such routine filings would not be very notable. For Reed, however, they represent a milestone, marking the first time in two years that he filed one of these legally required reports on time. Read More ›
January 12, 2016 | Administration & Lobbying
Heading into the 2016 election, there is widespread dissatisfaction across the political spectrum with the amount of money in politics and the excessive influence wielded by powerful interests. Donald Trump has argued his candidacy presents an antidote: someone extremely wealthy can finance his own campaign, reject money from those who would seek to influence him, and once in office, change the system to reduce the influence of money. Read More ›
January 6, 2016 | Elections