
LA Times cites CREW study in article on passage of bill banning payment to spouses from campaign funds
CREW is getting very good coverage in the articles about passage of the legislation banning payment to spouses from campaign funds. The Los Angeles Times cites the findings of our report, Family Affair, in its piece today:
Under a bill the House approved Monday, members of Congress would no longer be able to put their spouses on their campaign payrolls, a practice criticized as a way for lawmakers to profit from political donations.
The action comes after a number of lawmakers, including Rep. John T. Doolittle (R-Roseville), have come under scrutiny for paying their spouses from campaign funds.
Doolittle's wife took 15% of the campaign contributions she raised for her husband, once earning $90,000 from a single event.
But dozens of other lawmakers from both parties have paid their spouses, children or other relatives out of campaign funds.
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a watchdog group, found that at least 64 House members paid relatives from their campaign funds or PACs during the last three election cycles.
The measure, approved on a voice vote, comes as a broader overhaul of lobbying rules has stalled. But with Congress suffering from dismal job-approval ratings, Democratic leaders were anxious to showcase progress on ethics reform, an issue that was a central theme in their successful campaign last year to win the majority.



LA Times falls short
it was the work of CREW that exposed these practices and forced the hand of an embarrassed House. The media needs to give credit where credit is due.
CREW has shown us the way to accomplish reform. Good for CREW.