Today, CREW got a response to the ethics complaint filed in September 2005 against Senator Bill Frist (now former Senator Frist)

In September of 2005, CREW filed an ethics complaint against then-Majority Leader Bill Frist alleging that the Senator violated Senate ethics rules by engaging in apparent insider trading and then attempting to cover it up.

Today, we got a response. Yep, two years later. And, with Frist out of the Senate, we're told nothing can be done. Of course, Frist was in the Senate for over a year after the complaint was filed. Melanie Sloan had to say and the letter is below:

In a case of too little too late, further demonstrating the need for a congressional Office of Public Integrity, the Senate Ethics Committee has – two years later – responded to CREW’s fall, 2005 ethics complaints against former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist. Astonishingly, after failing to take action while Senator Frist was in office, the Ethics Committee now notes it does not have jurisdiction over former members, meaning it is now barred from acting. What does this mean? Senator Pete Domenici, retiring at the end of this term, has nothing to worry about.

Laws Oriented to protect Congress?

It seems that laws and Congressional Committees are oriented to protecting the positions of Congresspersons. Isn't that backwards, or rather shouldn't sheer palpable neglect control investigations into misconduct within Congress?

About CREW

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington uses high-impact legal actions to target government officials who sacrifice the common good to special interests. Receive email updates:
Optional Member Code

Ethics in the News