CREW wants explanation of inconsistent testimony over missing emails

You can't tell Congress one thing and a court another thing. That doesn't work in our system. The truth matters. And, CREW is determined to get to the truth -- even against the Bush administration:

A private group told a federal court Thursday the Bush administration made apparently false and misleading statements in court about the White House e-mail controversy.

The group asked the judge to demand an explanation regarding alleged inconsistencies between testimony at a congressional hearing last week and what the White House told a federal court in January.

"This evidence demonstrates defendants' blatant disregard for the truth and the processes of this court," Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington told U.S. District Judge Henry Kennedy in court papers.

CREW wants the judge to compel the Executive Office of the President to explain why it should not be held in contempt of court.

In a sworn declaration, White House official Theresa Payton told the court on Jan. 16 that "substantially all" e-mails from 2003 to 2005 should be contained on back-up computer tapes.

However, at a hearing of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Feb. 26, the panel's Democrats released a White House document that called that claim into question.

Don't let them get away

Thanks CREW for your work on this issue. The only concern I have is, can this court battle be fought after the election so we don't get another Sooter Libby type pardon for those responsible?

About CREW

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington uses high-impact legal actions to target government officials who sacrifice the common good to special interests. Receive email updates:
Optional Member Code