Anchorage Daily News ponders potential indictments of Senator Stevens and Rep. Young
There are only two incumbent federal candidates on the ballot in Alaska. Both are facing primary and general election challenges. As the Anchorage Daily News reports, both are also facing the possibility of criminal indictments:
Campaigning under the cloud of federal investigations is tough enough, but could Sen. Ted Stevens or Rep. Don Young have the added worries of an indictment before they face the voters? Would prosecutors wait until after the election to bring charges to avoid the appearance of meddling in Alaska politics?
It's been 21 months since the federal corruption investigation surfaced in Alaska with a series of dramatic raids on legislative and other offices. Eight cases have been brought, resulting in convictions in all but one -- and that matter is still pending.
No one outside the government is privy to where the investigation is headed and whether it will eventually lead to charges against Stevens and Young, who deny wrongdoing but who won't discuss specifics about the allegations.
It remains especially difficult to charge members of Congress for matters related to legislation. The Constitution's Speech or Debate Clause offers a broad shield against interference by the Justice Department and other agencies of the executive branch into how a congressman might have created, for example, an earmark that benefited a campaign contributor, family member or former aide -- matters that are part of the investigations of Young and Stevens.
US DOJ won't be indicting Young & Stevens
Last week's newest indictments of Dusty Foggo were incomplete. What was missing was Foggo's sabotage of the inventor of the tech standard called "smart wallet" by NIST. Stevens and Young have the same in common as Foggo and they did it via their control of repsective transportation committees.
Last week US DOJ sent the inventor of the smart wallet (Immtec, Inc.) a message that it condoned Foggo's sabotage of the smart wallet inventor and its management's lives for the last 6 1/2 years. Foggo worked for a Russian crime gang, and it was that crime gang that orchestrated the 1999 Moscow apartment building attacks, 2001 attacks in the US, all the attacks on our allies' transportation infrastructure since, murder of Anna Politkovskaya and murder of Alexander Litvinenko.
Since 12/01 the aforementioned crime gang linked to Vladmir Putin did all it could to control the smart wallet inventor. That crime gang wants a financial incentive in us so that it has renewed reasons to attack the US. As shareholders when we are awarded contracts to prevent new attacks, the crime gang would derive financial interest to commit the new attacks to persuade the adoption of our platform. The same crime gang already owns a majority interest in the smart card suppliers.
It needs to be understood by the reader of this comment that the Russian mob has a common enemy of democracy as Islamic fundamentalists. The Russian mob provides intelligence training and financing to those willing to die for the cause to quash to democracy.
Last week US DOJ sent a message to Immtec that it condones our extradition into enemy control because US DOJ hasn't a single intention of prosecuting our saboteurs. Young and Stevens were the authors of the 2006 Transportation bill that made official Immtec's deportation into enemy control. Like with Foggo, US DOJ will condone Immtec's extradition by not prosecuting Young and Stevens.
Many members of Congress have been wondering what happened to Immtec and its platform. It exists and is being launched in the US private sector right now in the US southwest. Unfortunately, congressional staffers don't know of the inquiries that appear in congressional hearing transcripts so when I try to provide the answer what happened to us, staffers give me the cold soldier. I am head of Immtec's government operations.
When US DOJ sent the message that it won't prosecute Immtec's saboteurs that have been working for 911 conspirators since 1/02, Immtec had a change of heart. We will be selling-out to the enemy. More than 6 1/2 years of turning down financial offers while our government officials did all they could to ruin management's lives (I just has to go w/o a furnace for 3 winters in the NE b/c of Foggo's relationship with the NSA. Cheney's son-in-law signed off on the illicit home invasions and electronic surveillance of my bedrooms while head of US DOJ Office of General Counsel; Paul Schneider--the current DHS Deputy Secretary was the NSA Senior Acquisition Officer that signed the illicit contract involving my home) and now US DOJ interprets the law to condone such activity, has made us change our minds.
The smart card was invented more than 50 years ago. It is anticipated Immtec's digital wallet platform will have at least a 2 generation product life cycle, too. Because of the message US DOJ sent Immtec last week in the latest Foggo indictments, Americans can expect at least 2 generations of lives in the US to be ruined.
I most of all want to explain that US DOJ will never indict Young and Stevens for their greatest of crimes. The most they might be indicted on are rather mild charges, as was shown last week when Foggo had new charges added, last October when Brent Wilkes was tried and in Congressman Ney's plea deal. In the plea deal there is mention of "something else" Putin wanted. The something else was Immtec. One of Ney's false and misleading statements made was to refer to Immtec's platform as the TIA (DARPA/Poindexter's Total Information Awareness program) technology. Immtec doesn't provide data mining in its product line but Congress was misled to believe by Ney and others like DeLay and Christopher Cox that we do.
Immtec management gave it our all for more than 6 1/2 years when it wasn't even our job to decline financial offers and worry about Americans' well-being. That was Congress, the Bush Administration, DOD/DHS and US DOJ's jobs! Last week's Foggo indictments shred our last hope, so now we will sellout to our 2001 attackers knowing that while 2+ generations of lives will be ruined, US DOJ also won't prosecute Young and Stevens just like it won't prosecute Dusty Foggo because US DOJ acts as a mob foot soldier and performs the duties of 911 insiders.
US DOJ's interpretation of the law says that no patriot company with products of interest to our enemies will be in compliance with the law until they agree to become controlled by our 2001 attackers! For 6 1/2 years management fought US DOJ's interpretation of US law for every American's benefit, but as of this week when we saw last week's Foggo indictments we concluded we no longer could fight US DOJ's 911 insider agenda. Stevens and Young had a 911 nsider agenda, too, and US DOJ will not prosecute Stevens and Young for what US DOJ itself condones.
Speech or Debate Clause offers a broad shield
... a license to steal.
Syndicate this content
Nonsense. The DOJ lawyers have no say on them.
The Grand Jury is who will INDICT both Stevens and Young, they are in total control as is the special prosecutor.
You are going to be forcefully shown to be wrong, the Jury has the final say on every single detail.
http://www.fija.org
http://letsibeledmondsspeak.blogspot.com