CREW finds several candidates, besides Sarah Palin, violated election law by using campaign funds for clothing

Last month, CREW filed an FEC complaint against Palin and the RNC for improperly spending $150,000 on clothing for Palin and her family, in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA).  Sarah Palin wasn't the only candidate to improperly use campaign funds to buy clothes.

Today, CREW filed a Federal Election Commission (FEC) complaint against candidates for the House of Representatives and the presidency, for improperly spending campaign funds in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA).  Our complaint can be found here.

According to FEC reports, clothing purchases were made by the campaign committees of Reps. Loretta Sanchez (D-CA) and Rob Andrews (D-NJ), Utah congressional candidate Bill Dew (R), North Carolina congressional candidate William Breazeale (R), and Andrew MacPherson, campaign staffer for Bob Barr‘s 2008 presidential campaign committee.

The amount each candidate spent on clothing is as follows:

Rep. Andrews, $952.04

Rep. Sanchez, $334.09

Bill Dew, $1,089.16

William Breazeale, $1,000

Andrew MacPherson, Barr campaign staffer, $500.00

These acquisitions violate campaign finance law.

FECA specifically prohibits a candidate for federal office from converting campaign funds to personal use. FEC regulations make clear that the prohibition applies to clothing purchases, such as those made for the above listed candidates.

Melanie Sloan, executive director of CREW, said today:

Sarah Palin wasn’t the only candidate to violate the law by using campaign money for clothing, several others did as well. Campaign finance laws are not optional, but if candidates can’t abide by these laws how can we trust them to be lawmakers?  There is no excuse for this conduct; the FEC should investigate these members and candidates immediately.

Bookmark and Share

Share

Money spent on clothes for campaigns

Why is it that you brought attention to Palin's spending on clothes and not the other candidates BEFORE the election? Sounds like your non-profit status should be questioned since your purpose was not to keep candidates honest but to dishonestly sway citizens votes.

If YOU notice these other

If YOU notice these other candidates spending was less than $1,000. not $180K!

What's interesting is that

What's interesting is that you say Sarah Palin violated election law here, but you must not know how to read. Either that or you are intentionally lying. That's bad ethics on your part.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jun/08/palin-fends-off-all-ethics-charges-brought-since-0/?feat=home_features