<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.citizensforethics.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington - Scooter Libby</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/814/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Plame considers appeal after Court upholds dismissal of case against Cheney and other Bush officials</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/33683</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g_ACa6CkcSzdE59XlaTORl-5QvNQD92GROHG0&quot;&gt;Today&lt;/a&gt;, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld the dismissal of Valerie Plame&amp;#39;s lawsuit against Vice President Dick Cheney, Karl Rove, Scooter Libby and Richard Armitage.  Plame is considering an appeal: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Melanie Sloan, Plame&amp;#39;s attorney at the liberal watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, said Plame was considering an appeal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;It is simply unacceptable for top government officials to be unaccountable for such a gross abuse of their power,&amp;quot; Sloan said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The lawsuit named former presidential adviser Karl Rove; Cheney&amp;#39;s former top aide, I. Lewis &amp;quot;Scooter&amp;quot; Libby; and former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Armitage was the original source for a 2003 newspaper column identifying Plame as a CIA officer. At the time, her husband was criticizing the Bush administration&amp;#39;s prewar intelligence on Iraq and had become a thorn in the side of the White House. Rove also discussed Plame&amp;#39;s employment with reporters.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The leak touched off a lengthy investigation that resulted in Libby&amp;#39;s conviction for obstruction and lying to investigators. Jurors found that he told reporters about Plame and lied about it to the FBI and a federal grand jury. Bush commuted Libby&amp;#39;s sentence before he ever served a day in prison.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/33683#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/843">CIA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/813">Dick Cheney</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/814">Scooter Libby</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/743">Valerie Plame</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:55:48 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>crew</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">33683 at http://www.citizensforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Scooter Libby disbarred over crimes stemming from CIA leak</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/31294</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Scooter Libby lost his license to &lt;a href=&quot;http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jRVmK64uVMRFqykV50bWxVAiQMoQD8VH8S600&quot;&gt;practice law today&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Former top White House aide I. Lewis &amp;quot;Scooter&amp;quot; Libby was banned Thursday from practicing law in the nation&amp;#39;s capital following his perjury conviction in the case of a CIA operative&amp;#39;s leaked identity. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The disbarment order of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia had been expected.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;When a member of the bar is convicted of an offense involving moral turpitude, disbarment is mandatory,&amp;quot; the appeals court ruled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/31294#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/814">Scooter Libby</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:19:03 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>crew</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">31294 at http://www.citizensforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Scooter Libby withdraws appeal of felony conviction that was already commuted</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/30570</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The highest ranking Bush administration official convicted of a crime is foregoing his appeal of that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/10/AR2007121000719_pf.html&quot;&gt;conviction&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Former vice presidential chief of staff I. Lewis &amp;quot;Scooter&amp;quot; Libby this morning gave up the appeal of his perjury and obstruction convictions in connection with the CIA leak case, his attorney said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Libby, whose 30-month prison sentence was commuted by President Bush just before he was to begin serving it, continues to maintain his innocence, attorney Theodore V. Wells Jr. said in a statement. But, Wells said, &amp;quot;the burden on Mr. Libby and his young family of continuing to pursue his complete vindication are too great to ask them to bear.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a result, Wells said, Libby filed a motion in U.S. District Court in Washington today to dismiss the appeal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A federal jury convicted Libby in March of four felonies for lying to FBI agents and the grand jury that investigated the leak of the identity of then-covert CIA operative Valerie Plame. Libby was found guilty of two perjury counts and one count each of obstructing justice and making false statements -- about when and how he learned Plame&amp;#39;s identity, and what he told journalists about her.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Libby has already paid the $250,000 fine levied upon him, Wells said. He will remain on supervised release for a total of two years and must complete 400 hours of community service as part of his criminal sentence.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bush has never ruled out a full pardon of Libby, who was the only person charged in connection with the leak case. Unless such a pardon is issued, Libby will remain a convicted felon.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/30570#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/814">Scooter Libby</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:42:41 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>crew</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30570 at http://www.citizensforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Libby&#039;s trial judge &quot;perplexed&quot; by Bush saying the sentence was &quot;excessive&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/29413</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Judge Reggie Walton, who was appointed to the federal bench by George W. Bush in 2001, revealed his thoughts on Bush&amp;#39;s commutation of Libby&amp;#39;s sentence in a footnote to a legal document.  Walton, like so many of us, is &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-libby13jul13,1,4756939,print.story?ctrack=2&amp;amp;cset=true&quot;&gt;perplexed&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt; by Bush&amp;#39;s words and action:   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;In an unusual expression of frustration, the judge who sentenced former White House aide I. Lewis &amp;quot;Scooter&amp;quot; Libby to 30 months in jail, only to see the sentence commuted by President Bush, said he was &amp;quot;perplexed&amp;quot; by the act of clemency.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In his first public comments on the matter, U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton took issue with Bush&amp;#39;s statement that the prison sentence ordered for Libby last month was &amp;quot;excessive.&amp;quot; Walton defended the sentence, saying that he followed established legal precedents as well as a strict interpretation of federal sentencing guidelines that has been supported by Bush&amp;#39;s own administration. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;In light of these considerations … it is fair to say that the court is somewhat perplexed as to how its sentence could accurately be characterized as &amp;#39;excessive,&amp;#39; &amp;quot; Walton wrote. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Although it is certainly the president&amp;#39;s prerogative to justify the exercise of his constitutional commutation power in whatever manner he chooses, the court notes that the term of incarceration imposed in this case was determined after a careful consideration of each of the requisite statutory factors.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The judge, who was appointed to the federal bench by Bush in 2001 in part because of his tough law-and-order approach to sentencing, made the comments in a lengthy footnote to an order issued Thursday.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hat tip &lt;a href=&quot;http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/13/thinkfast-july-13-2007/&quot;&gt;Think Progress.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/29413#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/897">George Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/814">Scooter Libby</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 09:33:44 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>crew</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29413 at http://www.citizensforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Watch CREW&#039;s Melanie Sloan on Hardball talking about the Libby deal</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/29348</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;object width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;350&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/b7WLNsynBPE&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/b7WLNsynBPE&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; wmode=&quot;transparent&quot; width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;350&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/29348#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/814">Scooter Libby</category>
 <pubDate>Fri,  6 Jul 2007 13:42:45 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>crew</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29348 at http://www.citizensforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Questions over whether Bush&#039;s order could preclude Libby from even serving probation</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/29312</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;One of George Bush&amp;#39;s justifications for commuting Scooter Libby&amp;#39;s sentence was the Libby would still have to pay the $250,000 fine -- and serve his probation.  Libby did pay the fine today, but, the Federal District Court Judge has questioned whether the probation can still be applied.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kirotv.com/politics/13628631/detail.html&quot;&gt;Bush&amp;#39;s commutation order&lt;/a&gt; may have absolved Libby of that punishment: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Former White House aide Lewis Libby has paid a $250,000 fine as part of his sentence in the CIA leak case, but the probation he was scheduled to serve under the commutation of his prison sentence may not be served after all.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to a July 3 order issued by Judge Reggie Walton, who was the trial judge in Libby&amp;#39;s case: &amp;quot;Strictly construed, the statute authorizing the imposition of supervised release indicates that such release should only occur after the defendant has already served a term of imprisonment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;President George W. Bush commuted the 30-month prison term that Libby was scheduled to serve before he served a day of it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;White House spokesman Scott Stanzel said that under Walton&amp;#39;s June 22 sentencing order, Libby was required to report to the probation office within 72 hours of the release from custody to serve his period of supervision by the probation office.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/29312#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/897">George Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/814">Scooter Libby</category>
 <pubDate>Thu,  5 Jul 2007 17:17:58 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>crew</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29312 at http://www.citizensforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>House Judiciary Committee will hold hearings on Bush&#039;s commutation of Libby&#039;s sentence</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/29280</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hearings on the Libby case will take place next week, via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/003603.php&quot;&gt;TPM Muckraker&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;entry_body&quot;&gt;On Capitol Hill, House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers (D-MI) has already called for hearing next Wednesday at noon titled &amp;quot;The Use and Misuse of Presidential Clemency Power for Executive Branch Officials.&amp;quot; According to a committee aide, the hearing will have an eye to the future as much as the past. President Bush thinks jail time is &amp;quot;excessive&amp;quot; for an administration official convicted of lying to protect higher administration officials. In his statement announcing the hearing, Conyers worried about such a precedent: &amp;quot;Taken to its extreme, the use of such authority could completely circumvent the law enforcement process and prevent credible efforts to investigate wrongdoing in the executive branch.&amp;quot; The aide told me that potential witnesses for the hearing include legal scholars, pardon experts, and administration officials.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/29280#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/897">George Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/814">Scooter Libby</category>
 <pubDate>Thu,  5 Jul 2007 13:09:07 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>crew</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29280 at http://www.citizensforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Joseph Wilson responds to Tony Snow:  Bush officials show &quot;deep disdain&quot; for those who risk lives for their country</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/29262</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;During today&amp;#39;s White House press briefing, Bush spokesman Tony Snow once again showed the administration&amp;#39;s lack of respect for the intelligence community -- and their contempt for the rule of law.   Mr. Snow managed to question the veracity of Ambassador Joseph WIlson. The transcript of the briefing is below. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here is the response from &lt;a href=&quot;/node/29261&quot;&gt;Ambassador Wilson&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;To claim that leaking the identity of a covert operative is simply part of the &amp;quot;Washington culture&amp;quot; suggests a deep disdain for those patriots who risk their lives to protect our national security. Mr. Snow&amp;#39;s comment was insulting not just to Valerie Wilson, but to all covert operatives who believe that in return for their sacrifices, our government will do everything it can to protect them. A genuine and sincere apology from the White House -- not just to Mrs. Wilson, but the entire intelligence community -- is long overdue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The president is now implicated in an ongoing cover-up and obstruction of justice, there remains, according to special counsel Fitzgerald, a cloud over the Vice President and Libby is a four time convicted liar, perjurer, and obstructor of justice. The administration once again, regrettably, attacks others rather than accepts responsibility for their actions and crimes. The American people know better. We know the difference between right and wrong even if the president, the vice president and their spokesmen do not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And here&amp;#39;s the latest salvo from the White House &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/07/20070703-6.html&quot;&gt;Press Secretary Tony Snow&lt;/a&gt; prompting that statement from Ambassador Wilson: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt; Q    And also, let me ask you this.  The President and other White House press secretaries would not touch this question of Joe Wilson during the height of the investigation.  I&amp;#39;m going to ask you now, since the President is now basically saying this is over and he&amp;#39;s done what he&amp;#39;s done -- Joe Wilson asked for an apology for the American people because of the situation.  Is the White House now willing to give the American people --  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; MR. SNOW:  I&amp;#39;m not going to get into --  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Q    Why not?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; MR. SNOW:  Because --  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Q    Why not?  It&amp;#39;s over now.  You didn&amp;#39;t want to talk about it then.  Let&amp;#39;s talk about it now.  Do you think the American people are owed something because of the breach?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SNOW:  Number one, there is still considerable controversy about the facts of the case, including Joe Wilson&amp;#39;s veracity.   Number two, there is also...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  QUESTION:  (inaudible) question about his veracity?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SNOW:  ... there is also -- just very quickly, you take a look at the Senate report, his characterization of who sent him over and what he told people when he was in Niger is at direct odds with what he tended to tell the American public.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/29262#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/749">Joseph Wilson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/814">Scooter Libby</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/743">Valerie Plame</category>
 <pubDate>Tue,  3 Jul 2007 14:25:33 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>crew</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29262 at http://www.citizensforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bush on Libby:  Full pardon still possible</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/29260</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;George Bush was asked directly about the Scooter Libby case today.  His response left open the possibility that Libby would receive a full pardon according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSWAT00783220070703?src=070307_1253_TOPSTORY_pardon_not_ruled_out&quot;&gt;Reuters:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;President George W. Bush on Tuesday refused to rule out a pardon for former White House aide Lewis &amp;quot;Scooter&amp;quot; Libby, a day after sparing him from prison in a case that helped seal his Iraq legacy and gave ammunition to Democrats.       &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bush, who angered Democrats but reassured conservatives by saving Libby from serving a 2-1/2 year prison sentence, told reporters who asked about an eventual full pardon for Libby: &amp;quot;As to the future I rule nothing in and nothing out.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/29260#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/814">Scooter Libby</category>
 <pubDate>Tue,  3 Jul 2007 12:26:28 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>crew</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29260 at http://www.citizensforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Melanie Sloan on Hardball: &quot;I think it&#039;s outrageous&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/29259</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Melanie Sloan appeared on MSNBC&amp;#39;s Hardball last night to talk about the commutation of Scooter Libby&amp;#39;s prison sentence by George Bush.  She put it plainly, &amp;quot;it&amp;#39;s outrageous&amp;quot;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;object width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;350&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/lPzyPW8etC4&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/lPzyPW8etC4&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; wmode=&quot;transparent&quot; width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;350&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/29259#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/814">Scooter Libby</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/743">Valerie Plame</category>
 <pubDate>Tue,  3 Jul 2007 12:07:01 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>crew</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29259 at http://www.citizensforethics.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
