<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.citizensforethics.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington - Scott Jennings</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/915/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Leahy issues subpoena for Karl Rove</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/29568</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Bush day on Capitol HIll. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN2636722220070726?&amp;amp;src=072607_1411_DOUBLEFEATURE_push_for_probe&quot;&gt; More late-breaking news &lt;/a&gt;in the scandal surrounding the firing of the U.S. Attorneys.  The Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Patrick Leahy (D-VT) issued a subpoena for top Bush aide, Karl Rove, today:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The chairman of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee said on Thursday he had subpoenaed two more White House aides, including political adviser Karl Rove, in the probe of fired federal prosecutors.       &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;This is not a step I take lightly,&amp;quot; Sen. Patrick Leahy declared in a Senate speech.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was yet another salvo in the ongoing dispute with the White House. Congress appears headed toward a court fight with President George W. Bush, who has claimed executive privilege in refusing to provide documents or testimony by current or former aides, now including Rove and deputy political director Jay Jennings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/29568#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/762">Karl Rove</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/915">Scott Jennings</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:16:30 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>crew</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29568 at http://www.citizensforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Rep. Waxman wants RNC e-mails relating to White House  and politics</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/27478</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Eariler today, Rep. Henry Waxman, Chair of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Affairs, wrote to the Chair of the Republican National Committee.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.speaker.gov/blog/?p=211&quot;&gt;Waxman wants the RNC&lt;/a&gt; e-mails including those using the &amp;quot;gwb43.com&amp;quot; address that were sent relating to the now infamous powerpoint presentation at the &lt;a href=&quot;/node/27356&quot;&gt;General Services Administration&lt;/a&gt; and any other similar activities: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Last week, the Committee held a hearing into allegations of misconduct at the General Services Administration. One of the issues examined at the hearing involved a partisan political presentation that White House Deputy Director of Political Affairs, J. Scott Jennings, made to the GSA Administrator, Lurita A. Doan, and approximately 40 GSA appointees in the GSA headquarters building on January 26, 2007. At this event, Mr. Jennings presented a 28-page PowerPoint briefing that reviewed the 2006 election results and identified the Republican party’s top electoral targets in upcoming federal and state elections. Following the presentation, Ms. Doan asked her staff to consider how GSA resources could be used to help “our candidates” in the next election.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Serious questions were raised at the hearing about the legality and propriety of Mr. Jennings’s presentation and the discussion that followed it. In addition, the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service issued a report finding that the presentation itself and Ms. Doan’s comments could be violations of the federal Hatch Act.[1] According to a White House spokesperson, however: “This is regular communication from the White House to political appointees throughout the administration.”[2]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In communicating with GSA about the presentation, Mr. Jennings and his assistant used “gwb43.com” e-mail accounts maintained by the RNC rather than their official White House e-mail accounts. In their e-mails, they described the presentation as a “close hold” and said that “we’re not supposed to be emailing it around.”[3]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To assist the Committee in its investigation of these issues, I request that you provide any electronic messages sent or received by Karl Rove, J. Scott Jennings, or any other White House officials using accounts maintained by the RNC that relate to (1) the January 26, 2007, PowerPoint presentation at GSA, (2) the presentation of any similar political briefings at other federal agencies or to other federal employees, or (3) the use of federal agencies or resources to help Republican candidates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;snip&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[1]  Memorandum from Congressional Research Service to House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, &lt;em&gt;Meetings, Conferences as “Political Activities” in a Federal Office, and “Hatch Act” Considerations&lt;/em&gt; (Mar. 26, 2007) (online at www.oversight.house.gov/ Documents/20070328154603-20874.pdf).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[2]  &lt;em&gt;Panel Asks Rove for Information on ’08 Election Presentation&lt;/em&gt;, Washington Post (Mar. 30, 2007).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[3]  Email from Jocelyn Webster to Tessa Truesdale (Jan. 19, 2007) (W-02-0310).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/27478#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/762">Karl Rove</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/932">RNC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/915">Scott Jennings</category>
 <pubDate>Wed,  4 Apr 2007 16:09:27 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>crew</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27478 at http://www.citizensforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A political briefing at GSA HQ violates the Hatch Act</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/27392</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;At &lt;a href=&quot;/node/27385&quot;&gt;yesterday&amp;#39;s hearing&lt;/a&gt; on misconduct at the General Services Administration before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, some very revealing emails were disclosed that indicated further use by White House officials of RNC email accounts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://oversight.house.gov/Documents/20070328151038-24811.pdf&quot;&gt;These emails&lt;/a&gt; accompanied a&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/20070328151840-07177.pdf&quot;&gt;PowerPoint presentation&lt;/a&gt; prepared by the White House Office of Political Affairs targeting the most vulnerable democratic members of the House and Senate.  The White House will undoubtedly continue to &lt;a href=&quot;/node/27380&quot;&gt;defend White House staffers&amp;#39; use of RNC email accounts&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold&quot;&gt; &lt;/span&gt;as required by the Hatch Act, which allows certain White House staff to conduct political activities while at the White House but prohibits them from using government resources to do so. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here’s the hitch, however -- if these materials were truly “political,” then &lt;a href=&quot;/files/execcorruption/reports/Doan.pdf&quot;&gt;GSA administrator Lurita Doan&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold&quot;&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;and others violated the Hatch Act when they allowed and participated directly in partisan political activity at GSA headquarters during working hours.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/27392#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/750">Bush Administration</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/916">Hatch Act</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/905">Lurita Doan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/915">Scott Jennings</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:33:26 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anne Weismann</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27392 at http://www.citizensforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;gwb43.com&quot; e-mails used to arrange briefing for GSA</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/27387</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;para&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;para&quot;&gt;As we noted yesterday, the Administrator of the General Services Administration, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/27382&quot;&gt;Lurita Doan&lt;/a&gt;, testified at a House hearing yesterday about a political presentation given to her staff by White House staff.  Ms. Doan has been named as one of the 25 most corrupt members of the Bush Administration by CREW in our report, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensforethics.org/execcorruption&quot;&gt;Criminals &amp;amp; Scoundrels&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;para&quot;&gt; &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;para&quot;&gt; &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;para&quot;&gt;A report in &lt;a href=&quot;http://federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2657083&quot;&gt;Federal Times &lt;/a&gt;reveals that the e-mail exchanges organizing the GSA event provide further proof of White House personnel using outside e-mail systems: &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;para&quot;&gt;Slides list Democrat “targets” and vulnerable Republicans, along with other Republican electoral information. It was presented by Scott Jennings, White House deputy director for political affairs, at a luncheon teleconference for GSA senior staff and political appointees. Jennings, an aide to Bush administration adviser Karl Rove, also was involved in the firing of Bud Cummins III, one of the eight U.S. attorneys fired last year.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;para&quot;&gt; &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;para&quot;&gt; &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;para&quot;&gt;A Jan. 19 &lt;a href=&quot;http://oversight.house.gov/Documents/20070328151038-24811.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;e-mail&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; regarding the slideshow, sent from an unofficial e-mail address by Jennings’ assistant to Doan’s, says “Please do not email this out or let people see it. It is a close hold and we’re not supposed to be emailing it around.” &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;para&quot;&gt; There seem to be a lot of those other e-mails floating around.   &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/27387#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/905">Lurita Doan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/906">Presidential Records Act</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/915">Scott Jennings</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 07:28:37 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>crew</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27387 at http://www.citizensforethics.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
