The growing emphasis on state policy goals by both political parties has led to the proliferation of political organizations designed to raise and spend money – much of it from special interests – to win specific state offices. The most prominent of these groups are the Democratic and Republican Governors Associations, but other party-connected groups target secretary of state, state legislator, and state Supreme Court races.
These special interest-backed groups, which are organized under section 527 of the tax code, go even further down-ballot than one might expect. Take two relatively new groups, for instance. The Republican Agriculture Commissioners Committee (RACC) and Community Leaders of America (CLA) are using the model of existing party 527 groups to elect Republicans in agriculture commissioner, mayoral, and city council races. Both groups were established ahead of the 2014 elections and quickly started raising significant sums from special interests.
This image comes from the website Ballotpedia.org. It is suitable for reuse under GFDL licensing.
Agriculture commissioners’ responsibilities vary by state, but include food safety issues, animal industry oversight, and regulating the use of pesticides.
Between forming early in 2013 and the end of 2014, the RACC raised $775,231. Like other party 527 groups, the RACC’s top donors are policy stakeholders. In 2013-14, the RACC received more than 97% of its contributions from corporations and trade associations. Many of the group’s few individual donors were executives of its corporate funders. More than a third of the RACC’s funding came from a single corporate donor, southern states’ grocery store Publix Super Markets, which gave $300,000. The group’s other top donors that cycle included tobacco giant Reynolds American ($60,909), agrochemical and biotech corporation Monsanto ($31,206), Feld Entertainment, which owns two top circus companies ($25,612), and fertilizer manufacturer Miracle-Gro ($23,391).
So far this election cycle, the RACC has raised $319,850, with less than $300 from individual donors. Publix Super Markets ($100,000) and Reynolds American ($50,000) again led the pack, followed by a non-profit, Protect the Harvest, which advocates for ranchers, hunters, and other animal owners ($20,594). Food makers’ trade association Grocery Manufacturers Association ($15,297), and retailer Wal-Mart ($15,000) were the fourth and fifth top givers.
The RACC disclosed contributions to Republican candidates for state agriculture commissioner and to state Republican parties in Mississippi, North Dakota, South Carolina, Louisiana, and Georgia. In 2014, Republicans won a clean sweep of seven agriculture commissioner races. Today, a Republican fills 11 of the 12 elected positions.
If the RACC is proof there’s no office too obscure for a concentrated party effort funded by policy stakeholders, the lesson of Community Leaders of America is that there’s no office too local. CLA seeks to elect Republicans to mayoral and city council positions with the help of corporate cash. The group was created “as a direct response to the lack of a unified national strategy supporting Republicans running for local elected offices.” Like more well-known state-spending groups, it is involved at multiples stages of the electoral process: candidate recruitment, training, and campaign financing. The group also provides “a forum where local elected leaders and members of the private sector can partner” to talk policy.
Between forming in July 2013 and the end of the 2014 election cycle, CLA raised $127,000. Every single contribution came from a corporation or trade association, many of them local government contractors. The group’s top 2014 donors included tobacco company Altria ($50,000), electric and gas power company Duke Energy ($25,000), landscaping corporation TruGreen ($15,000), utilities company Optech Monette ($10,000), and payday lender Advance America ($10,000).
So far in the 2016 election cycle, CLA has already raised more than six times what the group raised last cycle, $766,315. Just $2,279 came from individual donors. Top contributors include Altria ($100,000), appliance and utilities giant General Electric ($66,746), Reynolds American ($60,279), and waste disposal companies Republic Services ($53,279) and Waste Management ($32,779).
CLA has reported contributions to sixteen mayoral campaigns, including $25,000 to a PAC supporting Lenny Curry’s campaign in Jacksonville, Florida and $7,600 to David Fox’s campaign in Nashville, Tennessee. CLA has also given to local Republican party groups in San Diego, California, Harris County, Texas, and Albuquerque, New Mexico. In addition, the group reported a $5,000 contribution to a section 501(c)(4) dark money nonprofit, Catalyst Oklahoma, which spent in an Oklahoma City, Oklahoma mayoral race in 2014. CLA also reported a $10,000 contribution to Michigan Advocacy Trust, an organization CREW filed an IRS complaint against for spending millions of dollars on political ads supporting Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette without disclosing its donors. Oddly, the contribution came just a month before Michigan Advocacy Trust shuttered.
The RACC and CLA have more in common than their focus on electing Republicans in down-ballot races with industry cash. The groups share an Executive Director, Tim Barnes, who is also the founder of both groups’ top payee, Blue Wave Strategies. Barnes is a veteran of the party 527 fundraising and spending model: he was an early executive director of the Republican Attorneys General Association and chairman of the Republican State Leadership Committee before resigning amidst an investigation into a pass-through campaign finance scheme.
Democrats don’t appear to have analogous groups to the RACC and CLA, but it’s probably just a matter of time until they organize efforts to win the offices these groups target. Republicans’ REDMAP redistricting project led the Democratic Party to develop its own redistricting initiative, and both parties recently turned secretary of state races into big money affairs. The formation of the RACC and CLA, along with their fundraising success, demonstrate that no office is exempt from the onslaught of money from corporations and industry groups in elections.
More Blog Posts
The Federal Election Commission (“FEC”) has been heavily—and rightly—criticized for its failure to enforce federal campaign finance laws. New research by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), however, shows an additional—and even more basic—area where a number of FEC commissioners are failing in their jobs: the three Republican commissioners have repeatedly failed to fulfill their legal obligation to explain their decisions to block enforcement. Read More ›
Last week, the Supreme Court of the United States reversed the bribery conviction of former Virginia Governor Robert McDonnell, a man who freely admits that he sold access to himself and to his subordinates to a wealthy business man to lobby them to use government funds to pay for a study for the businessman, all in exchange for nearly $200,000 in cash and luxury goods, including a Rolex watch and flights in a private jet. In doing so, the Court issued a badly reasoned decision that unnecessarily and without textual basis narrowed the scope of the federal bribery statute. As Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (“CREW”) stated in the wake of the decision, it will make important corruption charges more difficult to bring and more difficult to prove, and it may result in serious corruption going unpunished. Read More ›
Following the horrific shooting of innocent civilians at an Orlando nightclub on June 12, many members of the media were quick to point out the National Rifle Association’s heavy-handed influence and how it contributes to the inaction of elected officials on gun-control issues. Read More ›
Earlier this week, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed IRS complaints against 10 politically active non-profit groups that sought to influence elections across the country in 2014. Many of the groups violated their tax-exempt status by impermissibly making politics their primary activity while others significantly underreported their political activity. CREW also filed complaints with the Department of Justice against six of the organizations that appear to have made false statements to the IRS about their political activity. Read More ›
Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA) has come under fire for charging thousands of dollars in personal expenses to his campaign, leading to FEC and Ethics complaints from CREW. Beyond the expenses he has admitted to being inappropriate—video games, oral surgery, a garage door opener—we’ve also found issues with what his campaign classifies as “Food & Beverages.” Read More ›
Former Jacksonville, FL City Council candidate Mincy Pollock was recently pulled into the scandal surrounding Rep. Corrine Brown (D-FL) and sham nonprofit One Door for Education. Pollock was visited by federal agents following allegations from his former business partner concerning checks that Pollock wrote from their business last year in a dizzying sequence of suspicious money movement—including two to One Door. A CREW investigation reveals that Pollock may have used One Door to indirectly fund a state ballot initiative expanding Medicaid, raising new questions about how One Door operated and why the One Door money was used to support the initiative. Read More ›