CREW sues American Action Network for failing to disclose donors
The district court ruled that Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) v. American Action Network (AAN) can proceed, issuing the first ever ruling on a motion to dismiss on a citizen suit brought under the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA). Read the decision below.
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) sued American Action Network (AAN) following the Federal Election Commission’s failure to conform with the Court’s declaration in a prior lawsuit. Despite two court orders demanding that the FEC take action action against AAN for its violations of the Federal Election Campaign Act, the FEC deadlocked twice when voting to decide if clearly political ads aired by AAN were meant to influence an election.
CREW is suing AAN in order to obtain the information — including the names of AAN’s donors — that AAN was legally required to, but did not disclose, and to uphold the enforcement of essential laws restricting secret political spending.
Lawsuit Documents
-
ComplaintApril 23, 2018
-
AAN's Motion to StayJune 1, 2018
-
Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to StayJune 22, 2018
-
Exhibit 1 - Plaintiff's Opposition to MotionExhibit 1 - Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Stay - June 22, 2018
-
Exhibit 2 - Plaintiff's Opposition to MotionExhibit 2 - Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Stay - June 22, 2018
-
Exhibit 3 - Plaintiff's Opposition to MotionExhibit 3 - Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Stay - June 22, 2018
-
Exhibit 4 - Plaintiff's Opposition to MotionExhibit 4 - Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Stay - June 22, 2018
-
Exhibit 5 - Plaintiff's Opposition to MotionExhibit 5 - Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Stay - June 22, 2018
-
AAN's Reply in Further Support of its MotionAAN's Reply in Further Support of its Motion to Stay - July 7, 2018
-
CREW's Motion for Leave to File SurreplyCREW's Motion for Leave to File Surreply in Opposition to Motion to Stay - July 12, 2018
-
Exhibit #1 - CREW's Motion for LeaveJuly 12, 2018
-
Exhibit #2 - CREW's Motion for LeaveJuly 12, 2018
-
AAN's Opposition to CREW's Motion for LeaveJuly 13, 2018
-
OrderJuly 27, 2018
-
Notice of Dismissal of AAN's AppealSeptember 19, 2018
-
Exhibit A - Notice of Dismissal of AAN's AppealSeptember 19, 2018
-
AAN's Motion to Dismiss & ExhibitsNovember 2, 2018
-
CREW's Opposition to AAN's Motion to DismissDecember 5, 2018
-
AAN's Reply in Support of Motion to DismissDecember 22, 2018
-
Transcript from HearingAugust 6, 2019
-
Memorandum OpinionSeptember 30, 2019
-
AAN's Motion for Interlocutory AppealOctober 18, 2019
-
AAN's AnswerOctober 28, 2019
-
CREW's Opposition to AAN's MotionCREW's Opposition to AAN's Motion for Interlocutory Appeal - November 1, 2019
-
AAN's Reply in Support of Interlocutory AppeaNovember 8, 2019
-
Order Denying Interlocutory AppealNovember 21, 2019
-
Notice of Constitutional ChallengeJuly 14, 2020
-
CREW's Response to AAN's NoticeCREW's Response to AAN's Notice of Constitutional Challenge - July 21, 2020
-
U.S. Acknowledgement of Constitutional QuestionSeptember 11, 2020
-
Motion for Reconsideration for DismissalMay 26, 2021
-
CREW Opposition to Motion for ReconsiderationJune 23, 2021
-
CREW Reply to CREW OppositionJune 30, 2021
-
Notice of Joint Stipulation of FactsJuly 8, 2021
-
Memorandum OpinionMarch 2, 2022
-
Notice of AppealMarch 30, 2022
-
CREW Unopposed Motion to Hold CaseApril 26, 2022
-
Clerk's Order Holding in AbeyanceApril 27, 2022
-
Public Brief for Plaintiff-AppellantMarch 29, 2023
-
Public Reply Brief for Plaintiff-AppellantJuly 28, 2023